Regretfully, the app is paid -, but you may rely upon the same logic while developing your tool. And you can't define an alias for each possible combination. It just can't know where to put those messages. sj26 / mailcatcher Public Notifications Fork 562 Star 5. ![]() Make sure to return a value from the callback function to not get any undefined values in the array. The key may be any JavaScript type (any primitive value or any type of JavaScript object ). The map () method returns undefined values when we forget to explicitly return a value in the callback function we passed to the method. Try it Syntax set(key, value) Parameters key The key of the element to add to the Map object. However, if no alias is defined (or no properly configured meta data), Odoo would ignore such emails. () The set () method adds or updates an entry in a Map object with a specified key and a value. That's why we have re-defined the method to put such emails in a special menu for further re-direction. Basically, if you have a properly configured catch-all, the emails would be there. For example, we faced a similar issue: not all users reply to messages, but create a new email. Iâm marking this as solved as I was able to replicate the issue and there is no real answer to your question - the stack trace you got is about as much information as the system has about the issue. And you cant define an alias for each possible combination. account: label: 'Project' widget: select options: - the first option - the second option thenextfield: Thanks for reaching out. ![]() Like this NoMethodError exception: arr 5. It just cant know where to put those messages. Hereâs some code to demonstrate this: arr 1,2,3 arr 5 nil This will often lead to all sorts of problems since we expect the method we called to return a valid value instead of a nil. However, if no alias is defined (or no properly configured meta data), Odoo would ignore such emails. Currently, undefined messages are ignored, but you may apply any sort of action on a code level. Basically, if you have a properly configured catch-all, the emails would be there. The only solution (I guess the only) is to re-define the method message_route of mail.thread. The analyzer infers that map to be of type but the code seems to assume either or .It just can't know where to put those messages. Ä«asically, if you have a properly configured catch-all, the emails would be there. In this case, the YAML defining this select widget has no options.Please have a look at this good explanation how aliases work (the first answer). we should try to validate things like - select widgets have an array of options and if it doesn't turn it into a text field and bubble up an error (in plain language) about what's wrong. var/www/ood/apps/sys/dashboard/app/models/batch_connect/session_context.rb:41:in `each' Fabric Mail Slot Mail Catcher Tutorial Large Wire Basket Wire Baskets Front Door Letters Front Doors Post Guard Diy Mailbox Select Hardware Top Opening Post Letterbox Letter Cage with Brass Finish 12' Folded Up Mudroom Apartment Decor Gang Umbrella Proof House Interior mail catcher folds up to allow door to open fully. var/www/ood/apps/sys/dashboard/app/helpers/batch_connect/session_contexts_helper.rb:11:in `create_widget' opt/ood/ondemand/root/usr/share/gems/2.7/ondemand/2.0.9/gems/bootstrap_form-4.5.0/lib/bootstrap_form/inputs/select.rb:11:in `select_with_bootstrap' opt/ood/ondemand/root/usr/share/gems/2.7/ondemand/2.0.9/gems/bootstrap_form-4.5.0/lib/bootstrap_form/form_group_builder.rb:24:in `form_group_builder' This job was working fine but I briefly deactivated it to try some other techniques. ![]() In my job (LoggingTest) I'm using a tLogCatcher component. opt/ood/ondemand/root/usr/share/gems/2.7/ondemand/2.0.9/gems/actionview-5.2.6/lib/action_view/helpers/form_options_helper.rb:823:in `select' The method tLogCather2Process (Map) is undefined.opt/ood/ondemand/root/usr/share/gems/2.7/ondemand/2.0.9/gems/actionview-5.2.6/lib/action_view/helpers/form_options_helper.rb:165:in `select' opt/ood/ondemand/root/usr/share/gems/2.7/ondemand/2.0.9/gems/actionview-5.2.6/lib/action_view/helpers/tags/select.rb:25:in `render' opt/ood/ondemand/root/usr/share/gems/2.7/ondemand/2.0.9/gems/actionview-5.2.6/lib/action_view/helpers/form_options_helper.rb:364:in `options_for_select' Of course maintainers may know off hand what this means/is, but the vast majority of admins/app developers would now know what's causing this. It's ⦠very hard to get a stack trace like below and know what it means.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |